Production AI systems engineering

Representative delivery patterns

Described at the architecture level. Client details are not disclosed. Each pattern reflects a real system — scoped, built, hardened, and handed off in production environments.

Retrieval Infrastructure B2B SaaS ~10 weeks

Permission-aware retrieval in multi-tenant systems

A B2B SaaS platform serving regulated-industry clients needed internal knowledge retrieval exposed to end users across multiple tenants. The challenge was not retrieval quality — it was enforcing access control at retrieval time. Documents carried role and tenant-level permissions that a standard RAG implementation would not respect. Post-filtering was insufficient: it couldn't prevent cross-tenant context from influencing generated responses. The system had to enforce boundaries at the index query layer, before any content reached the model.


Architecture approach

  • Ingestion pipeline with document normalization and permission metadata extraction at ingest time
  • Chunking strategy tuned to document structure and role-relevant content boundaries
  • RBAC-aware retrieval with identity-layer integration — access enforced at query, not filtered after
  • Offline evaluation harness with recall/precision baselines and adversarial query regression suite

Production properties

  • Tenant isolation enforced at index query time — zero cross-tenant document exposure
  • Retrieval audit trail aligned to compliance and data access requirements
  • Monitoring for recall drift and retrieval latency across tenant partitions
  • Runbooks and ownership documentation delivered at handoff
Delivery outcome The system shipped to production with permission boundaries validated under adversarial query testing and evaluation baselines established. Internal teams assumed full ownership with the ability to maintain and extend the retrieval pipeline without external support.
Agent Orchestration B2B SaaS ~12 weeks

Agentic workflow with human approval gates for an operations team

An operations team managing high-volume, multi-step workflows across several internal tools wanted to automate a class of repetitive decisions — while retaining human review for actions above a defined risk threshold. The challenge was not the automation itself but defining the boundary: what the agent could execute autonomously, what required approval, and what had to fail deterministically rather than degrade silently.


Architecture approach

  • Orchestration loop with explicit tool boundary definitions and least-privilege permissioning
  • Risk-tiered approval flow: auto-execute, human-in-loop, and hard-stop tiers
  • Tool-call logging and trace spans for full auditability
  • Evaluation test set covering edge cases, adversarial inputs, and boundary conditions

Production properties

  • Deterministic fallbacks for all failure modes — no silent degradation
  • Cost telemetry and per-workflow token budgets
  • Escalation path with clear notification and override mechanics
  • Regression checks integrated into CI pipeline
Delivery outcome Agentic system deployed with approval gates validated against real workflow data, cost controls active from day one, and operations team trained on override and monitoring procedures.

Discuss a delivery pattern

If one of these patterns maps to what you're building — or you have a different architecture problem — we can review your constraints and give you a clear picture of where your system will fail in production.

No commitment required. You'll leave with a clear architectural assessment — whether we work together or not.